Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Interactive seminars or small group tutorials in preclinical medical education: results of a randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jan 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Guerrero
17 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shinichiro Hirokawa
18 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leslie Tam
25 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hirotaka Onishi
27 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jessica A.B. van Nies
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Guerrero
2 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leslie Tam
3 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shinichiro Hirokawa
14 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jessica A.B. van Nies
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Jessica A.B. van Nies
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Nov 2010 Editorially accepted
13 Nov 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-10-79

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement