Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evidence-based choices of physicians: a comparative analysis of physicians participating in Internet CME and non-participants

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Oct 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Salinas
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Sargeant
13 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Barnes
11 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Salinas
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Barnes
16 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Sargeant
17 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Salinas
Resubmission - Version 4
17 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Salinas
Resubmission - Version 6
24 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
10 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
10 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-10-42

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement