Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Students' perceptions about the transition to the clinical phase of a medical curriculum with preclinical patient contacts; a focus group study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Nov 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rhoda MacKenzie
25 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Mclachlan
2 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mandy Moffat
2 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janet Yates
19 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Agnes Diemers
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Agnes Diemers
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Agnes Diemers
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Apr 2010 Editorially accepted
5 Apr 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-10-28

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement