This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Why medical students choose not to carry out an intercalated BSc: a questionnaire study
© Nicholson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 21 October 2009
Accepted: 23 March 2010
Published: 23 March 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Oct 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Murdoch-Eaton|
|17 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Howell|
|21 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alastair Hay|
|1 Feb 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Helen Galley|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Feb 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Helen Galley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Mar 2010||Editorially accepted|
|23 Mar 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-10-25|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.