Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A comparative evaluation of the effect of internet-based CME delivery format on satisfaction, knowledge and confidence

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jul 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Hadley
27 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jamie Coleman
31 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacek Walczak
13 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Vernon Curran
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Hadley
21 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Vernon Curran
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Vernon Curran
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
26 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Vernon Curran
Resubmission - Version 6
26 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
29 Jan 2010 Editorially accepted
29 Jan 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-10-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement