Reliability and acceptability of six station multiple mini-interviews: past-behavioural versus situational questions in postgraduate medical admission
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 7 November 2016
Accepted: 10 March 2017
Published: 16 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yen-Yuan Chen|
|30 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Danette Mckinley|
|1 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sandra Carr|
|26 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Toru Yamada|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Danette Mckinley|
|31 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yen-Yuan Chen|
|10 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Toru Yamada|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|16 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12909-017-0898-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.