Evaluation of the medical student research programme in Norwegian medical schools. A survey of students and supervisors
© Hunskaar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 17 November 2008
Accepted: 14 July 2009
Published: 14 July 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Nov 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Hays|
|27 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lee Gan Goh|
|8 May 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Steinar Hunskaar|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 May 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 May 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lee Gan Goh|
|15 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Steinar Hunskaar|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|9 Jul 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Steinar Hunskaar|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|9 Jul 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|14 Jul 2009||Editorially accepted|
|14 Jul 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-9-43|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.