Towards a basic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in acute stroke – identification of salient findings by the inexperienced examiner
© Warnecke et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 25 September 2008
Accepted: 10 March 2009
Published: 10 March 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Sep 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Oct 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Tobias Warnecke|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Oct 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Nov 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lalit Kalra|
|27 Nov 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annette Kelly|
|19 Dec 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Tobias Warnecke|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Dec 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Jan 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annette Kelly|
|6 Mar 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Tobias Warnecke|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|6 Mar 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|10 Mar 2009||Editorially accepted|
|10 Mar 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-9-13|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.