Research enrichment: evaluation of structured research in the curriculum for dental medicine students as part of the vertical and horizontal integration of biomedical training and discovery
© Kingsley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 28 June 2007
Accepted: 19 February 2008
Published: 19 February 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Jun 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Jul 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Iacopino|
|7 Aug 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Rosenstiel|
|25 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Linda Behar-Horenstein|
|7 Nov 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Karl Kingsley|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Nov 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Iacopino|
|20 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Rosenstiel|
|30 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Solomon|
|13 Feb 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Karl Kingsley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Feb 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Feb 2008||Editorially accepted|
|19 Feb 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-8-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.