Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A generalizability study of the medical judgment vignettes interview to assess students' noncognitive attributes for medical school

Contributed equally
BMC Medical Education20088:58

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-58

Received: 29 July 2008

Accepted: 10 December 2008

Published: 10 December 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
29 Jul 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ortrun Meissner
2 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Taylor
10 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Tyrone Donnon
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Dec 2008 Editorially accepted
10 Dec 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-8-58

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary