Family physicians' perceptions of academic detailing: a quantitative and qualitative study
© Allen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 06 November 2006
Accepted: 12 October 2007
Published: 12 October 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Nov 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Dec 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Linda Casebeer|
|1 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - marc De Meyere|
|5 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Schattner|
|8 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Flora Haaijer-Ruskamp|
|20 Apr 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Allen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Apr 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Schattner|
|14 Jun 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - marc De Meyere|
|18 Jul 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Allen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Jul 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - marc De Meyere|
|3 Oct 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Allen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Oct 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Oct 2007||Editorially accepted|
|12 Oct 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-7-36|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.