Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparative survey of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) attitudes, use, and information-seeking behaviour among medical students, residents & faculty

BMC Medical Education20066:58

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-58

Received: 13 July 2006

Accepted: 09 December 2006

Published: 09 December 2006

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
13 Jul 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jul 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Rakel
14 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victoria Maizes
5 Sep 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victor Sierpina
11 Sep 2006 Author responded Author comments - Desiree Lie
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Sep 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Dec 2006 Editorially accepted
9 Dec 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-6-58

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine