Comparative survey of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) attitudes, use, and information-seeking behaviour among medical students, residents & faculty
© Lie and Boker; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 13 July 2006
Accepted: 09 December 2006
Published: 09 December 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Jul 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Jul 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Rakel|
|14 Aug 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Victoria Maizes|
|5 Sep 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Victor Sierpina|
|11 Sep 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Desiree Lie|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Sep 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Dec 2006||Editorially accepted|
|9 Dec 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-6-58|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.