Life satisfaction and resilience in medical school – a six-year longitudinal, nationwide and comparative study
© Kjeldstadli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 09 March 2006
Accepted: 19 September 2006
Published: 19 September 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Mar 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Mar 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tait Shanafelt|
|30 Mar 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brian Mavis|
|22 May 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Kari Kjeldstadli|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 May 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jun 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brian Mavis|
|3 Jun 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tait Shanafelt|
|18 Sep 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Kari Kjeldstadli|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Sep 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Sep 2006||Editorially accepted|
|19 Sep 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-6-48|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.