Development and evaluation of a cultural competency training curriculum
© Thom et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 08 April 2006
Accepted: 26 July 2006
Published: 26 July 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Apr 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 May 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cindy Brach|
|26 May 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amy Blue|
|1 Jul 2006||Author responded||Author comments - David Thom|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Jul 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Jul 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cindy Brach|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Jul 2006||Author responded||Author comments - David Thom|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|17 Jul 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|19 Jul 2006||Author responded||Author comments - David Thom|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|19 Jul 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|26 Jul 2006||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jul 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-6-38|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.