Using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire to teach medical students developmental assessment: a descriptive analysis
© Nicol; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 12 October 2005
Accepted: 22 May 2006
Published: 22 May 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Oct 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Oct 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Weingarten|
|24 Oct 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maree O'Keefe|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Dec 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Pam Nicol|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Dec 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Dec 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maree O'Keefe|
|22 Feb 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Pam Nicol|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|22 Feb 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|27 Feb 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maree O'Keefe|
|10 Mar 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Pam Nicol|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|10 Mar 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|22 May 2006||Editorially accepted|
|22 May 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-6-29|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.