Sicily statement on evidence-based practice
© Dawes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 03 October 2004
Accepted: 05 January 2005
Published: 05 January 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Oct 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Oct 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rod Jackson|
|5 Nov 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Djulbegovic|
|7 Dec 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Martin Dawes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Dec 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Dec 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Djulbegovic|
|3 Jan 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Martin Dawes|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Jan 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|5 Jan 2005||Editorially accepted|
|5 Jan 2005||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-5-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.