A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats [ISRCTN40455708
© Solomon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 14 July 2004
Accepted: 29 November 2004
Published: 29 November 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Jul 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Aug 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Callas|
|18 Aug 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Steele|
|28 Aug 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Wofford|
|10 Sep 2004||Author responded||Author comments - David Solomon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Sep 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Oct 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Callas|
|21 Oct 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Steele|
|2 Nov 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Wofford|
|14 Nov 2004||Author responded||Author comments - David Solomon|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Nov 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Nov 2004||Editorially accepted|
|29 Nov 2004||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-4-27|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.