Development and validation of the CAM Health Belief Questionnaire (CHBQ) and CAM use and attitudes amongst medical students
© Lie and Boker; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 17 September 2003
Accepted: 12 January 2004
Published: 12 January 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Sep 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Oct 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Truls Ostbye|
|30 Oct 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sheila Greenfield|
|4 Dec 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Desiree Lie|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Dec 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Dec 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sheila Greenfield|
|23 Dec 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Truls Ostbye|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Jan 2004||Editorially accepted|
|12 Jan 2004||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-4-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.