Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Development and validation of the CAM Health Belief Questionnaire (CHBQ) and CAM use and attitudes amongst medical students

BMC Medical Education20044:2

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-4-2

Received: 17 September 2003

Accepted: 12 January 2004

Published: 12 January 2004

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Sep 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Oct 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Truls Ostbye
30 Oct 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheila Greenfield
4 Dec 2003 Author responded Author comments - Desiree Lie
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Dec 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Dec 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheila Greenfield
23 Dec 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Truls Ostbye
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Jan 2004 Editorially accepted
12 Jan 2004 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-4-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Family Medicine and the CAM Education Task Force, College of Medicine, University of California
(2)
Office of Educational Affairs, College of Medicine, University of California

Advertisement