Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures
© Uhari et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 12 September 2003
Accepted: 17 December 2003
Published: 17 December 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Sep 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Oct 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henry Mandin|
|24 Nov 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George brown|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Dec 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Matti Uhari|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Dec 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Dec 2003||Editorially accepted|
|17 Dec 2003||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-3-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.