Doctoral training in Uganda: evaluation of mentoring best practices at Makerere university college of health sciences
© Nakanjako et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 26 August 2013
Accepted: 8 January 2014
Published: 13 January 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Aug 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Damalie Nakanjako|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Crampton|
|18 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Meenakshi Swamy|
|19 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charlotte Rothwell|
|8 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Damalie Nakanjako|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Meenakshi Swamy|
|27 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Crampton|
|28 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charlotte Rothwell|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|8 Jan 2014||Editorially accepted|
|13 Jan 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-14-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.