Predictive validity of the UK clinical aptitude test in the final years of medical school: a prospective cohort study
© Husbands et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 31 July 2013
Accepted: 11 April 2014
Published: 23 April 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|31 Jul 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Adrian Husbands|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Boaz Shulruf|
|12 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Phillippa Poole|
|20 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernard Cerutti|
|31 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris Dewberry|
|6 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joy Rudland|
|9 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Adrian Husbands|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|23 Apr 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-14-88|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.