Video-based feedback of oral clinical presentations reduces the anxiety of ICU medical students: a multicentre, prospective, randomized study
- Matthieu Schmidt1, 2, 3Email author,
- Yonathan Freund4,
- Mickael Alves5,
- Antoine Monsel6,
- Vincent Labbe7,
- Elsa Darnal6,
- Jonathan Messika7,
- Jerome Bokobza8,
- Thomas Similowski†1, 2, 3 and
- Alexandre Duguet†1, 2, 3
© Schmidt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 8 May 2013
Accepted: 11 April 2014
Published: 22 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 May 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - dilek guldal|
|31 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jochanan Benbassat|
|11 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Matthieu SCHMIDT|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jochanan Benbassat|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|22 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-14-103|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.