Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Predictive factors affecting cecal intubation failure in colonoscopy trainees

  • Hong-Jun Park1,
  • Jin-Heon Hong1,
  • Hyun-Soo Kim1, 2Email author,
  • Bo-Ra Kim1,
  • So-Yeon Park1,
  • Ki-Won Jo1 and
  • Jae-Woo Kim1
BMC Medical Education201313:5

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-5

Received: 26 July 2012

Accepted: 31 December 2012

Published: 19 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Hong Jun Park
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruud Loffeld
29 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Felix Leung
12 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Hong Jun Park
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
31 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
19 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-13-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine
(2)
Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Lifelong Health, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine

Advertisement