Medical residents’ perceptions of their competencies and training needs in health care management: an international comparison
© Berkenbosch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 21 September 2012
Accepted: 3 February 2013
Published: 13 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Baume|
|15 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris van Weel|
|8 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lizanne Berkenbosch|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chris van Weel|
|27 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Baume|
|6 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Lizanne Berkenbosch|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|6 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|3 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|13 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-13-25|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.