Program evaluation of a model to integrate internationally educated health professionals into clinical practice
© Greig et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 5 November 2012
Accepted: 8 October 2013
Published: 11 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tamara Power|
|18 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carole Orchard|
|10 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judy Mannix|
|22 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Diana Dawes|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judy Mannix|
|21 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carole Orchard|
|19 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Diana Dawes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Oct 2013||Editorially accepted|
|11 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-13-140|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.