Personal health records in the preclinical medical curriculum: modeling student responses in a simple educational environment utilizing Google Health
© Karamanlis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 24 November 2011
Accepted: 18 September 2012
Published: 25 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - PANAGIOTIS BAMIDIS|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neil Harrison|
|15 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Hagger|
|17 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - PANAGIOTIS BAMIDIS|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neil Harrison|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|18 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|25 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-12-88|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.