Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial
© Houry et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 April 2012
Accepted: 16 August 2012
Published: 28 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Sklar|
|21 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aminah Jatoi|
|19 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Michael Callaham|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aminah Jatoi|
|10 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Sklar|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|28 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-12-83|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.