Gender differences in medical students’ motives and career choice
© Heiligers; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 20 May 2011
Accepted: 18 July 2012
Published: 23 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 May 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Phil J.M. Heiligers|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Abele|
|14 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jouke van der Zee|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Phil J.M. Heiligers|
|17 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jouke van der Zee|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|26 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|27 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Phil J.M. Heiligers|
|11 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jouke van der Zee|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|27 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|18 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|23 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-12-82|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.