Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Computer supported collaborative learning in a clerkship: an exploratory study on the relation of discussion activity and revision of critical appraisal papers

  • Willem JM Koops1Email author,
  • Cees PM van der Vleuten2,
  • Bas A de Leng2 and
  • Luc HEH Snoeckx3
BMC Medical Education201212:79

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-79

Received: 6 February 2012

Accepted: 3 May 2012

Published: 20 August 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
6 Feb 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sören Huwendiek
9 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nora Celebi
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Willem Koops
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 May 2012 Editorially accepted
20 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-12-79

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Medical Education, MMC Academy, Máxima Medical Center
Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University
Department of physiology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University