Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Virtual patients design and its effect on clinical reasoning and student experience: a protocol for a randomised factorial multi-centre study

  • James Bateman1, 2Email author,
  • Maggie E Allen2,
  • Jane Kidd1,
  • Nick Parsons3 and
  • David Davies1
BMC Medical Education201212:62

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-62

Received: 28 May 2012

Accepted: 4 July 2012

Published: 1 August 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
28 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - James Bateman
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
1 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-12-62

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Education and Development Research Team, Warwick Medical School
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, NHS Trust
Department of Statistics, Warwick Medical School