Comparison of communication skills between medical students admitted after interviews or on academic merits
© Dahlin et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2012
Received: 31 August 2011
Accepted: 12 June 2012
Published: 22 June 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Hampe|
|15 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Claudia Kiessling|
|20 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marie Dahlin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Hampe|
|6 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Claudia Kiessling|
|3 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marie Dahlin|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marie Dahlin|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|16 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|12 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|22 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-12-46|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.