Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Factors associated with intern noncompliance with the 2003 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s 30-hour duty period requirement

  • Christopher G Maloney1, 2Email author,
  • Armand H Matheny Antommaria1, 3,
  • James F Bale1, 4,
  • Jian Ying3,
  • Tom Greene3 and
  • Rajendu Srivastava1
BMC Medical Education201212:33

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-33

Received: 31 August 2011

Accepted: 23 May 2012

Published: 23 May 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Aug 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Landrigan
20 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Chris Maloney
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
23 May 2012 Editorially accepted
23 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-12-33

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine
(2)
Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine
(3)
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine
(4)
Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine

Advertisement