Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

An innovative OSCE clinical log station: a quantitative study of its influence on Log use by medical students

  • Judith N Hudson1Email author,
  • Helen Rienits2,
  • Linda Corrin3 and
  • Martin Olmos2
BMC Medical Education201212:111

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-111

Received: 21 July 2012

Accepted: 7 November 2012

Published: 12 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Snadden
10 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erik Driessen
1 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Judith Hudson
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Judith Hudson
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
12 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-12-111

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Deputy Head of School, School of Rural Medicine, University of New England
(2)
Graduate School of Medicine, University of Wollongong
(3)
Higher Education, University of Melbourne

Advertisement