Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to measure the perceived implementation of the mission statement of a competency based curriculum
© Rotthoff et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 14 May 2012
Accepted: 26 October 2012
Published: 7 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Victor Lim|
|12 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sam Leinster|
|3 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Rotthoff|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Rotthoff|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Rotthoff|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|1 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|7 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-12-109|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.