A method for developing standardised interactive education for complex clinical guidelines
© Vaughan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 12 November 2011
Accepted: 25 October 2012
Published: 6 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Wilkinson|
|30 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Robson|
|20 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jamie Meuser|
|10 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Janet Vaughan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tim Wilkinson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|6 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-12-108|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.