Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

What should we be selecting for? A systematic approach for determining which personal characteristics to assess for during admissions

Contributed equally
BMC Medical Education201212:105

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-105

Received: 14 November 2011

Accepted: 25 October 2012

Published: 5 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marlee Spafford
15 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bonnie Smith
22 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marilyn Baird
26 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michal Schneider-Kolsky
26 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Kent Hecker
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bonnie Smith
29 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marlee Spafford
11 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marilyn Baird
15 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michal Schneider-Kolsky
5 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Kent Hecker
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
25 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
5 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-12-105

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dean’s Office, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph
(2)
Department of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Education Research Unit, University of Calgary
(3)
G380 Health Sciences Centre

Advertisement