Accreditation council for graduate medical education (ACGME) annual anesthesiology residency and fellowship program review: a "report card" model for continuous improvement
© Rose and Long; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 15 October 2009
Accepted: 8 February 2010
Published: 8 February 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 Oct 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adel Gabriel|
|12 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nhan Thanh Vo|
|17 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Curtis Lee|
|3 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giuseppe Brera|
|6 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Timothy Long|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Timothy Long|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Feb 2010||Editorially accepted|
|8 Feb 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-10-13|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.